Webdav VS Samba / CIFS file system write and read speed test

Webdav VS Samba / CIFS file system write and read speed test

We made simple benchmark to compare Webdav vs Samba / CIFS file system write and read speed.

On local Intranet, we may be familiar with sharing files via your company file server using Samba / CIFS.

Webdav and Samba / CIFS Comparison

Samba is suitable for a closed network, but unsafe over the Internet.

WebDAV is different from SMB as it uses HTTP for transporting files and is designed from the ground up to be secure on the internet.

WebDAV can also use HTTPS, secure and encrypted HTTP, allowing no one to eavesdrop on your file transfer.

The Secure File Server can bypass company firewalls and proxies since the communication protocol is HTTP. It is possible to securely access your files from anywhere.

Benchmark Webdav vs Samba / CIFS

The server using for testing using Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1650 v3 @ 3.50GHz 6 cores (12 threads).

We does not know the specification of hardware that hosted Webdav and Samba share, but both of file system sharing hosted on same hardware.

Samba / CIFS write and read test:

Samba / CIFS file system write speed
Samba / CIFS file system write speed

Webdav write and read test:

Webdav file system write speed
Webdav file system write speed

On above results, clearly that Webdav file system 8 – 9 times faster than Samba / CIFS file system both n write test and read test.

So we choose Webdav as our backup file system.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *